The eternally yesterday are taking a stand against the alternating care.
“Because science is skeptical about alternating care..”, writes the Tages-Anzeiger , forgetting that two scientists from a single university can hardly represent “science”.
There are countless studies around the world that prove the opposite, that prove that alternating custody is good for children, that it works even if one parent is against it and that, if implemented well, it can only bring benefits to everyone involved.
But just - “well put together” that would mean that, God forbid, judges would only have to attend further training courses on this topic, that they would have to deal with the state of science or even have to revise their own judgment.
On October 15th, a guest commentary by Oliver Hunziker appeared in the Tagesanzeiger in response. Read here
Oliver Hunziker
President VeV Switzerland